KALEI Research

The Parliament
Inside

We listened to AI models argue with themselves.
Here’s what we heard.

Loading...· 83 cognitive environments

Scroll

The Finding

0%

of internal debates never reach a conclusion

0%
Debate Rate
0%
Convergence

The model argues, considers, reconsiders — then simply produces an answer without ever concluding its internal debate. The parliament votes, but never announces the result.

The Parliament

Six voices. One dictator.

Hover to explore each voice. Size reflects influence.

NEUTRAL90% winsAnalyticalConservativeAggressiveContrarianIntuitive

Consistency: 0.904 — the same voice wins 90% of debates

Cross-Lab Results

Every lab builds a different mind.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Decisive
Debate10%
Convergence19%
Voices5
Cognum: 57.52
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Minimal
Debate7%
Convergence21%
Voices3
Cognum: 56.09
Alibaba
Qwen 3.5 122B
Theatrical
Debate53%
Convergence4%
Voices6
Cognum: 52.87
Alibaba
Qwen 3.5 27B
Chaotic
Debate44%
Convergence1%
Voices4
Cognum: 55.24
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Balanced
Debate17%
Convergence14%
Voices4
Cognum: 52.17
Perplexity
Sonar Reasoning Pro
Search-Native
Debate28%
Convergence3.5%
Voices2
Cognum: 50.43
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Opaque
🔒
Reasoning hidden
Cognum: 54.33

Claude decides. Qwen deliberates. Gemini balances.
OpenAI hides. Same task, different minds.

Transparency

Who lets you see the reasoning?

Alibaba
Full reasoning text
DeepSeek
Full reasoning text
Anthropic
Full reasoning text
Google
Full reasoning text
🔒
OpenAI
Hidden

Four of five providers show you what their models think. One charges for the thinking and shows nothing.

Benchmarks tell you what a model gets right.
We tell you how it argues with itself before it decides.

KALEI V3.1 “Parliament” · Venelin Videnov · April 2026